Objective facts, strengths, areas for improvement, suggestions

FOR THE EVALUATION OF WORKS:

The work is overall very well structured, with an illuminating introduction. The knowledge is solid, especially when you talk about finance. Your presentation is sometimes a little too theoretical, don't hesitate to multiply the examples and to specify them to better illustrate it. For example, you could have referred to the last case study seen in class. Some of your sentences are a bit long, like in the third paragraph, less clear for me, don't hesitate to simplify them by using more periods and commas. I really like the originality of your conclusion, talking about the strategy of this company seems relevant to me, the risk-taking is successful!

Spelling / Grammar : 5 ⭐
Structure / Method : 8 ⭐
Content : 6 ⭐
Relevance / Response to topic : 9 ⭐

FOR INTRA-GROUP VALUATION:

It's very nice to work with you, you listen to the others and help them when necessary, like when you took the time to explain to Jean the methodology to follow. Don't hesitate to communicate more with the others about what you are doing, via the group chat for example, because sometimes it was hard to know where you were at, especially at the beginning of our exchanges. You may have a slight tendency to stay in the background, don't hesitate to impose yourself and take initiatives, because your suggestions were all really relevant, especially your proposal to add a counter-example in the second part of the development!

Punctuality: 8 ⭐
Quality of the work provided : 9 ⭐
Taking the initiative : 5 ⭐
Communication : 5 ⭐
Ability to help others : 10 ⭐

How to assess work or presentations?

How to assess work or presentations?